Skip to Main Content
It looks like you're using Internet Explorer 11 or older. This website works best with modern browsers such as the latest versions of Chrome, Firefox, Safari, and Edge. If you continue with this browser, you may see unexpected results.

Systematic Reviews: Home

What is a Systematic Review?

A Systematic Review is a summary that attempts to address a focused clinical question using methods designed to reduce the likelihood of bias. Systematic reviews provide a summary of the available literature using explicit methods to systematically search, critically appraise, and synthesize the world literature on a specific issue" (Straus et al, 2005). A meta-analysis is a type of systematic review that uses statistical, quantitative methods to describe the results.

Unlike simple review articles, a systematic review is based on a systematic review of the evidence and requires an exhaustive search of the literature. Review articles are more narrative and, while a good way to start your research or learn about a topic, do not follow the strict methodology demanded of a systematic review. A systematic review uses numerical or cross-study analysis to synthesize the findings of original studies and are more clinically based. Systematic reviews must clearly state why the research is being done and what methods were used to find the primary studies. These methods must be described so that the search process can be replicated.

Systematic reviews often require a significant time investment. Allen and Olkin, in 1999, reported 1139 hours were required for a review, on average, though the time investment was often dependent on the number of citations retrieved for a search.

Differences Between Narrative and Systematic Reviews

The table below, reproduced from Guyatt et al., 2008, illustrates the differences between traditional narrative reviews and systematic reviews.

Characteristic Narrative Review Systematic Review
Clinical Question Seldom reported, or addresses several general questions Focused question specifying population, intervention or exposure, and outcome
Search for primary articles Seldom reported; if reported not comprehensive Comprehensive search of several evidence sources
Selection of primary articles Seldom reported; if reported, often biased sample of studies Explicit inclusion and exclusion criteria for primary studies
Evaluation of quality of primary articles Seldom reported; if reported, not usually systematic Methodologic quality of primary articles is assessed
Summary of results of primary studies Usually qualitative nonsystematic summary Synthesis is systematic (qualitative or quantitative; if quantitative, this is often referred to as meta-analysis)

 

Rhonda Allard

Profile Photo
Rhonda J. Allard
Contact:
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9021-3672
301-295-3398

Recommended Guides

James A. Zimble Learning Resource Center • 4301 Jones Bridge Rd. Bethesda, MD 20814 • Main Number: 301-295-3189 • AMI Helpdesk: 301-295-3358

USU Logo